President’s Executive Order Is Addressed By The IRS: Employee Payroll Tax Deferral

On August 28, 2020, the IRS issued Notice 2020-65 that provides some needed guidance for employers wondering whether and how to comply with the employee payroll tax deferral described in the August 8, 2020 Presidential memorandum (often referred to as an “executive order.”). Even though the Notice leaves many questions unanswered, it addresses some key items.

UPCO Insight

Although the IRS Notice does not specifically state whether the employee payroll tax deferral is mandatory, the deferral appears to be voluntary, which lines up with Treasury Secretary Mnuchin’s widely reported comments.

Internal Revenue Code Section 7508A (which is the basis for the memorandum and the Notice) allows the President to postpone certain tax deadlines due to a disaster, such as COVID-19. However, Section 7508A does not give the President authority to require taxpayers to use the extended deadline. In other words, even if a deadline is postponed, a taxpayer could continue to adhere to the normal deadlines. As a result, employers can continue to withhold employee Social Security tax or Railroad Retirement tax from September 1 to December 31, 2020 if they do not wish to avail themselves of the deadline extension.

The Notice clearly places responsibility on employers for withholding and depositing the deferred taxes and states that penalties generally would apply for any failure to comply (although the Notice states that employers can “make arrangements to otherwise collect the total Applicable Taxes from the employee”). Neither the memorandum nor the Notice eliminates the tax liability.

It appears that the employee payroll tax deferral does not apply to self-employed individuals, since it only applies to Social Security tax and Railroad Retirement tax and does not include Self-Employment Contributions Act (SECA) taxes.

Background 

In an August 8, 2020 memorandum to the Secretary of the Treasury entitled, “Deferring Payroll Tax Obligations in Light of the Ongoing COVID-19 Disaster,” President Trump directed Treasury Secretary Mnuchin to use his authority to defer the withholding, deposit and payment of employee Social Security tax on wages (i.e., 6.2% of employee wages) or Railroad Retirement tax on compensation paid to certain employees during the period September 1 through December 31, 2020. The memorandum instructed the Treasury Department to issue guidance explaining how to implement the deferral and to explore avenues, including legislation, to eliminate the obligation to pay the deferred taxes. Secretary Mnuchin made comments in an August 10 interview that employers would not be required to offer the deferral.

UPCO Insight:

Since the guidance was released so close to the first available deferral date (i.e., September 1), employers have very little time to modify payroll procedures and payroll system to allow employees the deferral on the first pay cycle in September. Under the current IRS rules, it is not possible to “recover” the tax that already was withheld and remitted, but was eligible for the deferral, without causing issues with the employer tax filings and the imposition of penalties. Retroactive changes generally are not allowed simply because a taxpayer failed to use an available extension. This is consistent with the IRS’s position on employers that failed to timely defer the employer’s share of Social Security taxes (6.2%) as permitted under the CARES Act.

IRS Guidance

The two-and-a-half-page IRS guidance leaves unanswered many concerns surrounding the employee payroll tax deferral, but it does clarify several important points as they pertain to an employer’s payroll process.  Below is a summary of the guidance.

  • The employee payroll tax deferral applies to wages and compensation paid on a pay date during the period beginning on September 1, 2020 and ending on December 31, 2020.
  • The employee payroll tax deferral applies only if wages or compensation paid to an employee for a biweekly pay period are less than $4,000, or the equivalent amount with respect to other pay period frequencies. This threshold is determined on a pay period-by-period basis.

UPCO Insight:

Employees who are paid hourly or whose wages vary from pay period to pay period may not benefit from the payroll tax deferral in every pay period depending on whether the amount of wages exceeds the biweekly threshold of $4,000, or the equivalent. Employers should review with their IT departments or payroll service providers to ensure that the payroll system is configured correctly to determine who is eligible to participate in the employee payroll tax deferral on a pay period-by-pay period basis.

  • The due date for the deferred withholding and payment of the employee Social Security tax and Railroad Retirement tax is postponed until the period beginning on January 1, 2021 and ending on April 30, 2021.
  • Employers are responsible for the deferred taxes and must withhold and pay the deferred taxes ratably from wages and compensation paid between January 1, 2021 and April 30, 2021 or interest, penalties and additions to tax will begin to accrue on May 1, 2021 with respect to any unpaid deferred taxes. If the employee’s wages are not sufficient for the withholdings, the employer can pursue payment from the employee.

UPCO Insight:

The very short-term deferral and repayment period results in a modest benefit.

An employee who earns the Federal minimum wage would have an increased biweekly paycheck of $36 (or $324 for nine pay periods, from September 1 to December 31, 2020).  

For employees that earn the maximum $3,999 every two weeks for nine pay periods, the benefit is $2,231. ($3,999 x 6.2% x 9 pay periods).

Unless something happens to dramatically improve the employee’s household income before January 1, 2021, the repayment of taxes ratably over the first four months of 2021 may create a greater hardship than their current cash flow shortage.

Employer Dilemma

Many questions remain in terms of how the employee payroll tax deferral will impact employees and employers, how the deferred payroll taxes are to be reported and what changes must be made to an employer’s payroll system. Until the IRS provides further guidance regarding these outstanding questions and concerns, employers that consider implementing the employee payroll tax deferral should exercise care by putting safeguards in place to ensure that they do not fall victim to the IRS penalties.

Since the employee payroll tax deferral takes effect as early as September 1, 2020, employers that consider implementing the tax deferral likely will face a dilemma due to some of the unanswered questions unless the IRS issues additional guidance soon. For example:

  • Can a participating employer apply the same deferral policy to all employees, or must the employees be allowed to choose?
  • What are the consequences if an employee unexpectedly leaves the employer before paying the deferred tax?
  • If the employer cannot collect the taxes from former employees, is the employer liable for the tax or failure to withhold penalties?
  • What if the employee does not earn enough wages during the period between January and April of 2021 due to disability, leave of absence, etc., to pay for the deferred tax?
  • Does the employer report the deferred payroll tax as tax withheld on the employer’s quarterly tax returns (i.e., Form 941) and Forms W-2?
  • What happens if the employer did not defer the payroll tax, but the government later decides to forgive the deferred taxes? Will the employer or the employees be able to recover the tax that would have been forgiven had the tax been deferred?
  • Will the IRS provide a mechanism (e.g., revising the employer’s Form 941) to allow employers to “recover” the tax that was already withheld and remitted, but was eligible for the deferral, without causing issues with the employer tax filings and incurring penalties?
  • What if an employee receives a supplemental wage payment (e.g., bonus) outside of a normal pay period, how will that be treated for the purpose of the $4,000 eligibility threshold?

The World Of Technology: Innovation VS. Risk

The technology industry is proving out its resilience. As every industry responds to change and disruption, tech companies are being relied upon more than ever to accommodate remote work, food and supply access, health services, communication, connectivity and entertainment.

Innovation remains imperative. While it’s difficult to predict the near-term market and economic landscape, it’s clear that consumers and businesses will need new methods, ideas and approaches.

But breaking barriers can be risky—and costly. In the face of significant market volatility and global pressure, tech companies must flex their agility and continue their path to growth with a clear line of sight to their stakeholders.

Can tech leaders keep pace with the accelerated rate of change while effectively navigating an evolving threat landscape? To scale effectively long-term, tech leaders will need to consider the balance between innovation and risk holistically and with intent.

Here are a few hotbeds of innovative opportunity and some of the risks these pursuits may encounter.
 

BIG DATA 

Innovation

As more business goes digital, the volume of data being gathered is growing constantly. From a company’s on-premise systems to personal telecom and IoT devices and remote business-enablement software, the use of digital tools—and the data those tool aggregate—are growing every day. Companies that harness the power of that information by effectively managing their data can apply advanced analytics to draw meaningful insights and be better positioned to compete.

From a products and services standpoint, data management solutions are the critical half-step to successful storage, ethics, compliance and analysis. Data management and privacy-as-a-service can help companies maintain trust among users and regulators, while extracting value from their data.
 

Risk

Regardless of 2020 election results, data privacy regulations are on the agenda—in part pushed for by tech companies themselves. In fact, 50% of Tech CFOs surveyed in BDO’s 2020 Technology CFO Outlook Survey believe the industry needs to be more regulated.

Since the Facebook-Cambridge Analytics scandal arose, significant concerns have surfaced about the use of personal data for any number of purposes, from brand marketing and advertising, to political targeting, to intel for law enforcement.

The newly effective California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), along with Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), provides individuals ownership over their data, adding to the data governance and management obligations for tech companies.

Proposed track and trace methods to combat the spread of the coronavirus may be the new frontier in privacy issues. In any scenario, meeting and surpassing the demands of the various jurisdictions regulating data privacy will be essential for tech companies to rebuild and maintain consumer trust. After all, for most software companies, a fall in consumer trust in your products compared to those of your competitors can significantly impact revenue and market share in both the short and long term.

Outside of regulatory and trust considerations, prior to the pandemic, 29% of tech CFOs surveyed said a privacy breach was the top threat to their business. Targeting the critical data generated and stored by tech companies, cyber hacks will continue to plague the sector with increasing sophistication, potentially leading to greater losses and eroded trust—unless companies effectively mitigate the risk with ethical data management and security training.
 

Artificial Intelligence

Innovation

AI works to make sense of the vast amounts of data tech companies are generating. With the power to simplify the knowledge discovery process by aggregating and linking disparate data sources and analyzing it in real-time, AI can be a sharp competitive edge for the industry.

Simultaneously, AI is blurring industry lines, expanding the opportunities for tech innovation and partnerships. In healthcare, for instance, AI-based solutions turn medical tools into health monitoring devices and enable smartphones to work as diagnostic kits and radiology image readers.

AI is also increasingly being used to augment recruitment processes to address workforce concerns. From chatbots to interview scheduling and skill-matching, tech companies can look to AI for talent acquisition support.
 

Risk

There are unprecedented challenges spurred by AI, facial recognition and other emerging tech.

As a result of bad data or implicit bias on the part of software developers, human error can become concentrated once introduced into AI. These risks are heightened as tech companies face backlash for lack of diversity in their ranks, in addition to biased solutions. Algorithmic bias can cause severe damage to business operations and reputation.

Fear of machines replacing human-staffed positions also bears an existential concern. AI, unlike robotic process automation (RPA), is programmed not to be rules-based, but to refine its algorithm as it collects more and more data, essentially teaching itself and growing smarter over time.

Simultaneously, governance concerns resound. From weaponizing AI to hack systems, influencing political campaigns through deepfake videos or inadvertently revealing anonymized data through sorting and linking processes, industry leaders will need to demonstrate their strong ethics and realize they may be accountable for all potential uses of their tech.
 

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Innovation

Many CFOs report that managing an increasing volume of work and higher expectations is among their top personal challenges. RPA, a software-based solution, offers applications to handle repetitive and manual tasks. RPA can take over assignments including file management, form fulfillment, database entries, web scraping, calculations and statistics, among other rules-based programs.

By leveraging RPA, tech companies are positioned to redirect the focus of employees to more strategic work, further driving the business’ ability to innovate. RPA can also enable greater workforce value and talent retention by eliminating time-consuming, administrative work that professionals find burdensome or inefficient.
 

Risk

As increasing volumes of work and ballooning expectations lead to the adoption of RPA solutions, data security and privacy risks may be inadvertently introduced. Improper data use and automated access could lead to unintentional errors and liabilities, meaning RPA system adoption may require additional security controls.

Other risks of adopting RPA include: using incorrect source models when setting up the software, failing to meet data compliance obligations, pursuing unrealistic expectations, poor customer experience, applying improper shortcut settings, inadequate change management strategy and the failure to communicate blurring roles, duplicated efforts and a lack of integration.
 

5G

Innovation

Building the infrastructure and network of the fifth generation of mobile wireless communications—known as 5G—is the launching point for levelling up data transfer speeds and device connectivity. This means faster downloads and more mobile business operations with greater access to data-dense applications.

5G lays the groundwork for greater telecommunications coverage, which could power autonomous, driverless cars of the future, improve public transportation, provide essential healthcare technology and more, creating opportunities for tech-intersecting industries.
 

Risk

Continued geopolitical tensions, tightening borders, stringent intellectual property protections and trade limitations are top issues for the tech industry, especially as they relate to national security and innovation.

As China forges ahead with superior 5G telecommunications networks, American tech dominance comes under siege. The U.S. must catch up quickly without compromising the security of its networks.

5G infrastructure, which is set to “serve as the backbone for trillions of dollars’ worth of economic and industrial activity,” is facing restrictions in the U.S. due to security concerns around identified vulnerabilities that may serve as potential entry points for hackers.
 

Blockchain

Innovation

Digital ledger technology (DLT) promises greater data traceability, enhanced security and faster transaction times, which may be appealing to many tech companies and their clients, particularly with fewer transactions taking place face to face.

Fintech and banking start-ups are using blockchain to develop crypto-currencies and crypto applications, consequently eliminating the need for centralized financial intermediaries and offering customers access to decentralized digital assets.

At the same time, the entertainment sector is addressing creative ownership by tracking intellectual property rights through “chain-of-title” records, as well as smart contracts. Smart contracts—a means of streamlining and tracking payment records—also benefits digital advertisers, who can use the tech to fight fraud.
 

Risk

Blockchain and DLT’s untapped potential also illuminates this technology’s dark side: scalability, regulatory gray area due to an absence of standards, energy consumption costs, questionable network resilience and block integrity and data privacy considerations.

“Blockchain privacy poisoning” may be an especially significant threat to the integrity of this technology. Privacy poisoning refers to the insertion of personal data—an instance of an individual’s name along with any one of 29 additional confidential items—in the chain. Since a blockchain establishes a series of immutable records, meeting data privacy regulations may be particularly challenging.

There is a great deal of opportunity to unlock in blockchain technology, though there are still many variables left to be defined.

The longest bull market run in U.S. history has reached its finish line. As we enter the next cycle of the market and brace for continued uncertainty around the full and long-term impacts of COVID-19, tech companies need to be especially aware of their evolving risk environment. Innovation is essential, perhaps even more so in a challenged market, but tech companies will need to ensure a risk-based approach and responsible pursuit with any investment.

Most Recent Highlights From The SBA Regarding PPP Loans

By Brian Deutsch

The U.S. Small Business Administration released guidance answering 23 frequently asked questions regarding the forgiveness of Paycheck Protection Program loans.  Following are highlights from the guidance provided:

  • Eligible costs incurred before the Covered Period but paid during the Covered Period are eligible for loan forgiveness. Further, eligible costs incurred during the Covered Period but paid after the Covered Period could also be eligible for forgiveness if they are paid on or before the entity’s next regular payroll or billing date.
  • The employer portion of group healthcare benefits and employer contributions for retirement benefits paid or incurred during the Covered Period or “Alternative Payroll Covered Period” are eligible for forgiveness. Forgiveness will not be granted for amounts accelerated from periods outside the Covered Period or Alternative Payroll Covered Period.
  • Owner compensation is capped at $15,385 per owner for the 8-week period or $20,833 per owner for the 24-week period. The limitation applies across all businesses in which the owner has an ownership stake.
  • Health insurance contributions for S Corporation owners with at least a 2 percent stake in the business are not eligible for forgiveness, nor are the contributions for family members. Instead, these amounts are considered part of the owners’ cash compensation.
  • If an eligible organization has a rent or interest payment for a mortgage loan that existed prior to February 15, 2020 but is renewed or refinanced after that date, the lease payments under the renewed lease or interest payments on the refinanced mortgage are eligible for forgiveness.
  • Transportation, which is included as a utility eligible for forgiveness, is defined as ‘transportation utility fees assessed by state or local governments.”
  • When considering the full-time equivalent (FTE) employee reduction related to forgiveness, borrowers may exclude reductions that occur due to, “(1) an inability to rehire individuals who were employees of the borrower on February 15, 2020 and (2) an inability to hire similarly qualified individuals for unfilled positions on or before December 31, 2020.” Within 30 days of the employee’s rejection of the offer to rehire, borrowers must inform the applicable state unemployment insurance office. In addition, borrowers must maintain documentation, which could include a written offer to rehire the individual, a written record of the employee’s rejection of that offer, and a written record of efforts to hire a similarly qualified individual.
  • Seasonal employers should use the same 12-week period they used for calculating the maximum loan for the reference period for calculating any loan forgiveness reduction.
  • When calculating the forgiveness reduction related to salary/hourly wages, borrowers should only consider decreases in salaries or wages (not all forms of compensation).